Thursday, December 28, 2006
Khoodeelaar! responds to 'East London Advertiser' publishing another false statement for CrossRail hole-backer clique on Tower Hamkest Coucnil
Thursday 28 December 2006
© The Author/ Khoodeelaar /LCAN/CBRUK/LAWMEDIA 2006 London1142 Hrs GMTThursday 28 December 2006 "Labour only voted against Respect's repeated procedural motions, which would have risked important and urgent debates on issues including Crossrail, gambling and extensive works to the DLR" Cllr Denise Jones, as quoted in an alleged letter that is appearing on the web site of the East London Advertiser KHOODEELAAR! first response to that referebec to Crossrail in Denise Jones’s alleged statement: KHOODEELAAR! is asking the ‘East London Advertiser’, the publishers of the website of that Same name which carries the quoted statment attributed to Tower Hamlets Coucnil ‘leader’ Denise Jones, to put this on the record at the earliest opportunity available, to say that cllr Denise Jones is at best mistaken and worst she is lying when she pretends that her clique would have allowed a proper debate on crossrail [had it not been for the alleged interference by an opposition grouping on the council]. KHOODEELAAR! has put it on the record effective 4 may 2006 that Denise Jones has not understood anything that the khoodeelaar! campaign against crossrail hole has said. and despite several reminders, Denise Jones has neglected to even acknowledge the khoodeelaar! questions that are about both the policy and the practice of the tower hamlets council ion the crossrail hole bill. THE KHOODEELAAR! organiser Mr Muhammad Haque was lied to by tower hamlets council employees acting under the orders of the controlling clique that is on paper 'led' by Denise Jones. those lies were crossrail hole-inviting lies. those crossrail hole-inviting lies were conceived of and calculated by tower hamlets crossrail hole-inviter council to prevent and they did prevent the khoodeelaar! organiser from addressing the full council meeting in June 2006. despite several separately put questions about that particular incident of the crossrail hole-backer tower hamlets council controlling clique, the council’s then chief executive Christine Gilbert failed to provide any reason for the lies that tom Hogan, the employee involved in council meeting matters, was made to perpetrate as part of the operation to stop the khoodeelaar! organiser MUHAMMAD HAQUE from addressing the full council meeting in June 2006. There are literally hundreds of other instances of undeniable dishonesty and fraud as perpetrated by the controlling clique in Tower Hamlets Council which has lied and lied against local people and to the local community. The last thing the controlling clique wants is to have any open debate on the Coucnil about its sordid, corrupt, undemocratic and anti-social role for Crossrail hole plot. The plot to foist the CrossRail hole attack on the people of the East End was hatched by the then members of the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council who ‘negotiated’ to HAVE the Crossrail hole in the Borough in return, as they were stupidly ‘thinking’ for an additional barrage of degeneration in the East End. The ‘East London Advertiser’ has a duty to publish the truth, not lies and fictitious assertions. What Denise Jones says in the published statement is not at all the truth about what her clique has been doing for Crossrail. The ‘East London Advertiser’ has no excuse to keep publishing bogus assertions about Crossrail from Denise Jones, john Biggs et al when the fact is that Khoodeelaar! has made sure on several levels to get the ‘East London Advertiser’ ‘editorial’ personnel to know f every move and every argument and every action we are continuing to make and undertake against the remainder of the Crossrail hole threat to our community. The ‘East London Advertiser’ has also no excuse to keep allowing certain ‘other’ elements to make suggestive references to CrossRail as if THEY were doing anything against Crossrail hole either. The ‘East London Advertiser’ has yet to publish the retractions and apologies for the lie that it published in March 2006 when it used the word ‘campaign’ to paint the PERPETATORS of the Crossrail hole plot against Tower Hamlets as if they were doing the camapgn against their own actions, behaviour, statements, policy, plans an plots. The ‘East London Advertiser’ committed a lie on that occasion as Khoodeelaar! immediately pointed out. These are necessarily very brief summary of the relevant facts and the ‘East London Advertiser’ has a duty to correct the false publication and false records without any further delay, excuse or hesitation.
Thursday 28 December 2006
© The Author/ Khoodeelaar /LCAN/CBRUK/LAWMEDIA 2006 London1142 Hrs GMTThursday 28 December 2006 "Labour only voted against Respect's repeated procedural motions, which would have risked important and urgent debates on issues including Crossrail, gambling and extensive works to the DLR" Cllr Denise Jones, as quoted in an alleged letter that is appearing on the web site of the East London Advertiser KHOODEELAAR! first response to that referebec to Crossrail in Denise Jones’s alleged statement: KHOODEELAAR! is asking the ‘East London Advertiser’, the publishers of the website of that Same name which carries the quoted statment attributed to Tower Hamlets Coucnil ‘leader’ Denise Jones, to put this on the record at the earliest opportunity available, to say that cllr Denise Jones is at best mistaken and worst she is lying when she pretends that her clique would have allowed a proper debate on crossrail [had it not been for the alleged interference by an opposition grouping on the council]. KHOODEELAAR! has put it on the record effective 4 may 2006 that Denise Jones has not understood anything that the khoodeelaar! campaign against crossrail hole has said. and despite several reminders, Denise Jones has neglected to even acknowledge the khoodeelaar! questions that are about both the policy and the practice of the tower hamlets council ion the crossrail hole bill. THE KHOODEELAAR! organiser Mr Muhammad Haque was lied to by tower hamlets council employees acting under the orders of the controlling clique that is on paper 'led' by Denise Jones. those lies were crossrail hole-inviting lies. those crossrail hole-inviting lies were conceived of and calculated by tower hamlets crossrail hole-inviter council to prevent and they did prevent the khoodeelaar! organiser from addressing the full council meeting in June 2006. despite several separately put questions about that particular incident of the crossrail hole-backer tower hamlets council controlling clique, the council’s then chief executive Christine Gilbert failed to provide any reason for the lies that tom Hogan, the employee involved in council meeting matters, was made to perpetrate as part of the operation to stop the khoodeelaar! organiser MUHAMMAD HAQUE from addressing the full council meeting in June 2006. There are literally hundreds of other instances of undeniable dishonesty and fraud as perpetrated by the controlling clique in Tower Hamlets Council which has lied and lied against local people and to the local community. The last thing the controlling clique wants is to have any open debate on the Coucnil about its sordid, corrupt, undemocratic and anti-social role for Crossrail hole plot. The plot to foist the CrossRail hole attack on the people of the East End was hatched by the then members of the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council who ‘negotiated’ to HAVE the Crossrail hole in the Borough in return, as they were stupidly ‘thinking’ for an additional barrage of degeneration in the East End. The ‘East London Advertiser’ has a duty to publish the truth, not lies and fictitious assertions. What Denise Jones says in the published statement is not at all the truth about what her clique has been doing for Crossrail. The ‘East London Advertiser’ has no excuse to keep publishing bogus assertions about Crossrail from Denise Jones, john Biggs et al when the fact is that Khoodeelaar! has made sure on several levels to get the ‘East London Advertiser’ ‘editorial’ personnel to know f every move and every argument and every action we are continuing to make and undertake against the remainder of the Crossrail hole threat to our community. The ‘East London Advertiser’ has also no excuse to keep allowing certain ‘other’ elements to make suggestive references to CrossRail as if THEY were doing anything against Crossrail hole either. The ‘East London Advertiser’ has yet to publish the retractions and apologies for the lie that it published in March 2006 when it used the word ‘campaign’ to paint the PERPETATORS of the Crossrail hole plot against Tower Hamlets as if they were doing the camapgn against their own actions, behaviour, statements, policy, plans an plots. The ‘East London Advertiser’ committed a lie on that occasion as Khoodeelaar! immediately pointed out. These are necessarily very brief summary of the relevant facts and the ‘East London Advertiser’ has a duty to correct the false publication and false records without any further delay, excuse or hesitation.
